Joshua Tree Barnstormer

The Facts Shall Set You Free

Tag: BLM

Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone Solar Regional Mitigation Planning, Workshop #2

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is hosting a second public workshop for the Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone (SEZ) Solar Regional Mitigation Plan (SRMP) on October 24 and 25, from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., at the Hampton Inn Tropicana, 4975 S. Dean Martin Dr., Las Vegas 89118.

Vegas baby!

The topic of the workshop will be baseline conditions and unavoidable impacts and will include a field tour to the SEZ on Oct. 24.  

Like I said, Vegas, baby!   Oh wait, does that say S-E-….Z?  My bad.

In August, BLM described their solar energy program and discussed the development of regional mitigation plans as outlined in the July 24 Final Solar Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS). At the first workshop, more than 70 participants, including representatives from federal, state and local government, Tribes, the solar industry, utilities, environmental and other non-governmental organizations were asked to provide thoughts and ideas about mitigation for the Dry Lake SEZ, as well as ideas on future environmental monitoring and adaptive management for the SEZ.

An agenda for the October workshop, summary of the August workshop, frequently-asked questions and a preliminary list of data sources BLM is reviewing in support of the identification of unavoidable adverse impacts can be found on the Dry Lake SEZ Mitigation Project website.   The impacts associated with the Dry Lake SEZ are listed in this memo.

Those interested in attending the Oct 24/25 workshop or who would like to provide comments on the materials posted on the website should RSVP and send comments to: drylakemitigation@blm.gov.

NOTE:  RSVP by October 17 to reserve a bus seat for the field trip. 

Visit the Solar Energy Development PEIS website for more information:  http://solareis.anl.gov

History Repeats Itself

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” ~Edmund Burke

The Cadiz, Inc. press releases continue to entertain and to mystify.  How far will Cadiz, Inc. and Scott Slater go to perpetuate the myth of the parallel fictional universe where the Cadiz Project is miraculously free of impacts, free of conflicts, fully approved, and applauded by all?

An excerpt from an August 1, 2012 press release:

“The Project has received substantial support from San Bernardino and Orange County organizations and businesses, as well as water experts and industry professionals. Organizations that testified in support of the Project at the July 25 public hearing included South Orange County Chamber of Commerce and Economic Coalition, Association of California Cities-Orange County, Orange County Taxpayers Association, Rancho Santa Margarita Chamber of Commerce, Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce and the Engineering Contractors Association.

As part of a local outreach campaign, over 2,100 South Orange County residents and SMWD customers signed cards expressing support for SMWD’s efforts to improve water supply reliability and evaluate the Project. Nearly 500 support cards from the Hi-Desert region of San Bernardino County, which is local to the Project area, were also received.”  (August 1, 2012 Press Release, Marketwatch)

Slater gave the company line to the Metropolitan Water District of Orange County about one week after SMWD’s CEQA certification and project approval, when he provided a Project update at Metropolitan’s request.  The San Bernardino County Sentinel (August 10, 2012 edition) reports that Slater, during his presentation to Metropolitan, referenced “overwhelming [project] support from the citizens of San Bernardino County,”  one of the many exaggerations that riled Ruth Musser-Lopez, of Needles.

In an interesting turn of events last week, Musser-Lopez – previously known for her long, impassioned rants and her pitch of bright-white spikes for hair – may very well end up laughing last.  Just before the 30-day statute of limitations on CEQA challenges ended, Musser-Lopez filed, both individually and doing business as the Archaeological Heritage Association, River Branch (River AHA), a Petition for Peremptory Writ of Mandate and complaint for Declaratory Relief (Petition) against Ken Salazar, Secretary of the US Department of the Interior, the US Department of the Interior; the Bureau of Land Management; the County of San Bernardino and the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors as defendents.  SMWD, Cadiz, Inc., and Fenner Mutual Water Company are named as real parties in interest.

…and the number of cases against the Cadiz participants increases by one.

Meanwhile, at the Mojave Water Agency, the Board is considering their official position on the Cadiz Project.  I get the feeling that this wasn’t all that difficult a decision to make.  At their meeting on Thursday, September 13, at 3:30 pm, the Board will consider  RESOLUTION NO. 959-12 OF THE MOJAVE WATER AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS OPPOSING THE CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT, which essentially states:

WHEREAS, the Project proposes to extract an average of 50,000 acre-feet of water per year from the groundwater basins, resulting in a potentially unsustainable use of a limited water resource;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mojave Water Agency Board of Directors opposes the Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery and Storage Project.

Listen to MWA deliberate, or view their agenda by clicking here.

Last, but certainly not least.

Despite Slater’s blatant lies to Cadiz’s shareholders, there are still two major project hurdles in front of the Cadiz Project, notwithstanding the legal challenges the project must now face.  The San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors will have an opportunity to approve or deny the project and its Groundwater Monitoring and Mitigation Plan as early as October 1, 2012, when it meets in regular session.  Monitor the Board agenda as it evolves in the days leading up to the meeting date, or sign up to receive agenda updates by email on the County’s website, at County Direct.  In addition to attending the Board meeting at which they discuss and/or decide the fate of Cadiz, send a copy of your opposition letter(s)) (or write a brand new letter) to the County Board of Supervisors, with a copy to the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, or vice versa.

Similarly, Metropolitan has yet to approve the right-of-way permit to connect the Cadiz wells to the Colorado River Aqueduct.  Direct a copy of your opposition letter(s) (or if you still have some life left in ye, write a whole new damn letter!) to the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Board of Directors (click here for contact info).  If you recall, this is exactly how Metropolitan killed the Cadiz Project the first time around – by denying them this essential permit – and clearly Cadiz questions whether it will happen again (they are still trying to convert oil pipelines into water pipelines.  (Um, yeah.  Good luck with that.)   Right now the question on everyone’s minds is this:  what if history repeats itself?

We can only hope, and only time will tell.

BLM Announces Availability of Final Solar PEIS / Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone Mitigation Workshop

On July 24, 2012, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Department of Energy (DOE) issued a Press Release announcing the availability of the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States  (Final Solar PEIS) (BLM/DES 11–49, DOE/EIS–0403), together with proposed amendments to BLM’s Resource Management Plan (RMP). The Notice of Availability of the Final Solar PEIS was published in the Federal Register on July 27, 2012, which marks the start of a 30-day protest period, after which Secretary Salazar may consider adopting the document through a Record of Decision.

The Solar PEIS planning effort evaluated BLM lands in California, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah to identify areas most suitable for solar energy development, based on criteria such as excellent solar resources, good energy transmission potential, and relatively low conflict with biological, cultural and historic resources.  According to the press release, “input from stakeholders has been extremely valuable throughout this process,” said Acting BLM Director Mike Pool. “Their comments have helped to refine the zones to make sure they’re “smart from the start,” to improve the transmission analyses and to build effective incentives into this blueprint for solar development.”  More than 80,000 comments from cooperating agencies and stakeholders were submitted in response to the Draft Solar PEIS.

The Final Solar PEIS identifies BLM’s preferred alternative – the solar energy development program alternative – which would prioritize and incentivize utility-scale solar energy development within approximately 285,000 acres in 17 solar energy development zones (SEZs) across six western states; establish 19 million acres of “variance areas” outside the SEZs, within which utility-scale solar development would be considered under a proposed variance process; establish a process for industry, the public, and other stakeholders to collaboratively propose future SEZs, which is already underway in California’s Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan and West Chocolate Mountains Renewable Energy Evaluation; and protects natural and cultural resources by excluding approximately 78 million acres from solar energy development.

The preferred/program alternative would also establish authorization policies and procedures for utility-scale solar energy development, design features applicable to all development on BLM-administered lands,  a framework for regional mitigation plans, and a strategy for monitoring and adaptive management (the first mitigation pilot project for the Dry Lake SEZ is already underway. In total, the Final Solar PEIS estimates a total development of 23,700 megawatts from the 17 SEZs and the variance areas, which is enough energy to power 7 million American homes.

Click here to access the Final Solar PEIS.

Click here for a list of the 17 SEZs.

HOW TO STAY INVOLVED

SUBMIT A COMMENT

Publication of a Final EIS Notice of Availability does not trigger a formal public comment period. The Agencies, however, may choose to review any comments submitted following the publication of the Final EIS NOA and use them to inform the Records of Decision. Those individuals wishing to submit comments are asked to do so through the Solar Programmatic EIS Project Website (http://solareis.anl.gov). Individuals should note that the Agencies will consider such comments only to the extent practicable and will not respond to comments individually.

FILE A PROTEST

Instructions for filing a protest with the Director of the BLM regarding the Final Programmatic EIS and Proposed RMP Amendments may be found in the ‘‘Dear Reader’’ Letter’’ of the Final Solar PEIS and at 43 CFR 1610.5–2. All protests must be in writing and mailed to the appropriate address, as set forth below. Emailed and faxed protests will not be accepted as valid protests unless the protesting party also provides the original letter by either regular or overnight mail postmarked by the close of the protest period. Under these conditions, the BLM will consider the emailed or faxed protest as an advance copy and it will receive full consideration. If you wish to provide the BLM with such advance notification, please direct emails to bhudgens@blm.gov and faxed protests to the attention of the BLM protest coordinator at 202–245–0028.

DEADLINES:  BLM planning regulations state that any person who meets the conditions as described in the regulations may protest the BLM’s Final Programmatic EIS and Proposed RMP Amendments. A person who meets the conditions and files a protest must file the protest within 30 days of the date that the Environmental Protection Agency publishes its Notice of Availability (NOA) in the Federal Register. The NOA was published on July 27, 2012.

ADDRESSES:  All protests must be in writing and mailed to one of the following addresses:

  • Regular Mail     BLM Director (210), Attention: Brenda Williams, P.O. Box 71383, Washington, DC 20024–1383.
  • Overnight Mail     BLM Director (210), Attention: Brenda Williams, 20 M Street SE., Room 2134LM, Washington, DC 20003.

REQUEST MORE INFORMATION 

  • Shannon Stewart, Solar Energy Program Lead, BLM Washington Office, by email at shannon_stewart@blm.gov, or by telephone at 202–912–7219, to request CDs or printed copies of the Final Programmatic EIS, or for further information.
  • Jane Summerson, DOE Solar Programmatic EIS Document Manager, by email at jane.summerson@ee.doe.gov, or by telephone at 202–287–6188, for requests for information related to DOE’s proposed action.
  • Carol Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, GC–54, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585, by telephone at 202–586–4600, leave a message at 1–800–472–2756, or by email at askNEPA@hq.doe.gov, for general information regarding the DOE NEPA process.

NOTE:  Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1– 800–877–8339 to contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.

ATTEND THE DRY LAKE SEZ MITIGATION PILOT PROJECT PUBLIC WORKSHOP

On July 30, BLM announced that an upcoming public workshop on the Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone Mitigation Pilot Project will be held on August 29 and 30, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., at the Tuscany Suites and Casino, 255 East Flamingo Road, Las Vegas.

The BLM welcomes interested parties to attend the workshop, where they will share information about the solar energy program, hold discussions on developing the regional mitigation plans outlined in the Final Solar PEIS, and ask participants to provide thoughts and ideas about mitigation for the Dry Lake SEZ, as well as future environmental monitoring and adaptive management plans for the SEZ.

Comments on the Draft Solar PEIS revealed significant public interest in the cooperative development of regional mitigation plans for SEZs and a long-term and scientifically-based environmental monitoring and adaptive management plan for solar energy development on BLM-administered lands. Through the Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone Mitigation Pilot Project, the BLM will test the concepts on regional mitigation plans and monitoring and adaptive management plans presented in Appendix A of the Final Solar PEIS (Volume 6, Part 1).

The Draft Agenda for the Workshop can be reviewed or downloaded by clicking here. If you are interested in attending, please RSVP by August 21st to: drylakemitigation@blm.gov. Comments on the Draft Agenda can also be submitted to this address.

Proposed Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone (SEZ), July 2012

What’s Going On

“I’m Right On Top Of That, Rose!”

Raise your hand if you think you’re well-informed about the various development projects slated to be constructed in California’s deserts in the next 5 to 10 years?  Ok, hands down. Now, raise your hand if you think you  grasp the extent (i.e., scope and magnitude) of the desert development scheduled for the next decade.

What if you’re wrong?

Today’s post consists of a fairly robust (but by no means exhaustive) list of California Desert Region projects, plans, and programs that have been approved or are being considered for approval by agencies at the local, state, and/or federal level. Included in the discussion for each listing is an estimate of the scope/magnitude/extent of the proposed development, and, for the active projects, the latest status, how you can get involved, and who to contact for more information. Though I’ll largely be focused on the Dollar General and JT Casino projects from this point forward (though I reserve the right to deviate from your regularly scheduled program every now and again), I encourage you to get involved and stay involved in the local and regional decisionmaking processes. Read the public documents, write thoughtful comment letters, and attend the public meetings and hearings.  One of the primary objectives of CEQA and NEPA is to inform the public and involve the community in local decisionmaking; thus, the way to ymake your voice heard, get your needs met, and  ensure that your conditions of approval are incorporated into the project design, is to participate in the process.

Put another way, I know for a fact that most decisionmakers interpret public silence as agreement; if you object, but fail to speak up, you are complicit.

What’s Going On In The California Desert

Local  and Regional Projects / Plans

Town of Yucca Valley:   The Town of Yucca Valley is going to update their General Plan (estimated to be complete in 2013), a key feature of which will be the proposed alternatives for circulating traffic through the Old Town planning area. Community workshops will be held during the General Plan Update process to solicit input from community members and capture the community’s vision(s) of what Yucca Valley should become in 20 to 30 years. Community input will shape the vision and goals of the General Plan, which, in turn, will shape the future of the community.  Sign up to stay informed, receive upcoming General Plan announcements, events and opportunities to get involved. Fore more information, contact the Community Development Department at: (760) 369-6575.

Dollar General – Yucca Valley Store Location:  In August, the Yucca Valley Planning Commission approved construction of a 12,500-square-foot Dollar General store on a vacant 1.3-acre lot on Twentynine Palms Highway at Hopi Trail. There was no public comment on the proposal or the site plan and California Environmental Quality Act documentation (an initial study checklist) during the meeting.  The CEQA Initial Study Checklist submitted by Dollar General is among the worst I’ve seen during my career, with blatantly false responses to the checklist questions, and what is known in the industry as a “naked checklist” in which few – if any – of the questions are elaborated on to justify the response, and there are few – if any – of the standard mitigation measures designed to limit construction and operations impacts.  For shame, Yucca Valley. For shame.

South Side Neighborhood Community Park:  Yucca Valley is proposing to develop a phased, multi-purpose neighborhood/ community park on 37.75 acres located at the northwest corner of Joshua Lane and Warren Vista Avenue over “multiple years.”   South Side Park would include approximately 10 acres of multi-use athletic fields; 3 acres of playground and picnic areas, including tot lots; informal open space; a splash pad/water play improvements; an approximate 1.5 acre dog park; restroom and concession buildings; approximately 2 acres of vehicle parking; an approximate 1 acre native plant garden; sand volleyball courts; an approximately 5,000 square foot maintenance building; a frisbee golf course; walking and exercise trails; a minimum 2-acre undisturbed area; and ancillary park improvements including field lighting; parking lot lighting; access and maintenance roads; hardscape and sidewalk improvements; picnic and shade shelters; barbecues; horseshoe and shuffleboard areas; jogging and exercise courses and related improvements. An Initial Study supporting a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been released for public review and will be available for review until January 23, 2012. The project will be considered for approval at the Planning Commission Hearing on January 24, 2012, at 6 pm. For more information, contact Robert Kirschmann, Associate Planner, at (760) 369-6575 x328.

Residential Projects in Yucca Valley:  Numerous private residential development projects that have been approved in the last 10 years are listed on Yucca Valley’s website, along with copies of tentative tract maps.  Additional review may be necessary in the event that one or more of the older projects moves forward, as existing conditions have changed since the projects were approved and the regulatory environment has changed considerably.

City of Twentynine Palms: The City of Twentynine Palms is nearing the completion of their General Plan Update.  Several solar projects, including SEPV2 – a 2 MW PV solar facility – and SEPV8 – a 12 MW solar facility – were approved in 2011.  Solar projects near the City limits, such as SEPV9 – only 1.5 miles outside the City boundaries – remain in questionable status, though SECP Development Company received a Conditional Use Permit to establish the 100 MW solar PV power generating facility on 560 acres  (APN 0592-251-01-0000) after an Initial Study was prepared for the project.

Cadiz Groundwater Project:  Forbes dubbed it “the Zombie Water Project” because it was left for dead in 2002, when Metropolitan Water District, the CEQA lead agency, rejected it. A decade later, it rises from the grave.  The Cadiz Valley Water Conservation, Recovery and Storage Project is located in San Bernardino County between Cadiz and Rice, California. Underlying Cadiz Inc.’s private landholdings just south of the Mojave National Preserve is a natural aquifer system that is roughly equivalent in capacity to Lake Mead, the nation’s largest surface reservoir. The aquifer acts as an underground “lake,” and a good deal of water that reaches the aquifer ends up just below ground surface, where it evaporates.  The project would “capture”  or “mine” the water “lost” through evaporation and deliver it to water providers in southern California; in addition, the project would establish a  groundwater banking project for storing water in the aquifer during wet years.  Project opponents have voiced concerns that the project removes more groundwater than it or nature recharges, with detrimental effects on surface springs and ephemeral water in desert lake beds. Others are concerned that lowering groundwater levels will cause dust storms similar to what is occurring at Owens Lake.

The draft environmental impact report was released in December 2011 and will be open for public comment until February 13, 2012. Two comment meetings will be held regarding the scope, content, and analysis in the DEIR:  Tuesday, January 24 at 6:00 p.m. at SMWD offices and Wednesday, February 1 at 6:00 p.m. at the Joshua Tree Community Center. Send written comments on the DEIR to Tom Barnes, ESA.  For more information, e-mail cadizproject@smwd.com.

Rice Solar Energy Project: Approved by the California Energy Commission in December 2010 and one of nine large-scale solar projects approved by Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar in December 2011, the Rice Project is a 150 MW Solar Energy Project that will be constructed east of Twentynine Palms and south of Highway 62, on 1,410 acres of “previously disturbed private land” in Riverside County, with 8 miles (154 acres) of transmission lines across public (BLM) lands.  The project will utilize a Solar Thermal Power Tower with molten salt storage that can sapture solar energy and deliver power to the grid even after sunset, producing electricity to power 45,000 to 112,500 homes.  The project will generate up to 450 jobs during peak construction periods and 50 permanent jobs.

Other Nearby Desert Region Solar Projects:  In addition to the Rice Solar Energy Project, the CEC and Department of the Interior approved other large-scale solar projects in 2011, including the Desert Sunlight Solar Farm that will be constructed on 4,165 acres of public (BLM) lands in Riverside County, east of Palm Springs.  Desert Sunlight is a 550 MW thin film PV project that will generate electricity to power  over 165,000 homes and create 645 total jobs.  Abengoa Mojave Solar in San Bernardino County, north of Highway 58 and northwest of Barstow, is a 250 MW parabolic trough project that will be constructed on 1,765 acres of private, previously-disturbed lands (fallow agriculture), with 85 miles of transmission lines, 17 miles of which will cross public (BLM) lands. Abengoa will generate enough electricity to power 75000 to 187,500 homes and will create 830 jobs during construction and 60 permanent jobs.   Other large-scale approved projects are located in Imperial County, San Diego County, and Maricopa County (4,000 acres).

A decision on the 2011 Palen Solar Project is still pending by the Department of the Interior.  Palen Solar would consist of two identical 250 MW concentrated solar thermal plants.  Palen would be constructed 10 miles east of Desert Center along I-10, about halfway between Indio and Blythe in Riverside County, creating up to 1,145 jobs during peak construction.  An application has been filed with BLM for a right-of-way (ROW) grant of approximately 5,200 acres.

Of the priority 2012 projects located in California’s Desert Region,  the McCoy Solar Energy Project would be located in Riverside County, on about 7,700 acres of BLM land and 470 acres of private lands located about 13 miles northwest of Blythe.  A 16 mile generation tie-in line would be needed to tie the project to SoCal Edison’s infrastructure.  McCoy would power 225,000 homes and employ 600 workers during peak construction and 13 to 20 during operations.  The Desert Harvest Solar Farm would be located 6 miles north of Desert Center in Riverside County, on 1,280 acres of private lands.  The 150 MW project would power 45,000 homes and employ up to 300 workers.  Calico Solar, a 664 MW project that would be constructed on 4,604 acres of public (BLM) land, would be located in San Bernardino County, 37 miles east of Barstow, just north of I-40.  To stay informed, visit http://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/prog/energy/fasttrack.html

Regional Multi-state and Federal Plans / Programs

Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative (RETI) / Competitive Renewable Energy Zones (CREZs):   Of the 32 Competitive Renewable Energy Zones (CREZs) identified in California, two are local – the Iron Mountain CREZ (~40,000 acres) and the Twentynine Palms CREZ (~18,256 acres). The Iron Mountain CREZ has an estimated capacity of 4,800 MW solar thermal and 62 MW wind, for a total 4,862 MW, but it ranked 32 of 32 (last) in terms of affordability (average weighted cost per MW). The Twentynine Palms CREZ has an estimated capacity of 1,805 MW solar thermal and ranked 17 of 32 (with 1 being best) in affordability. Currently, there are 6 solar projects or proposals in the Twentynine Palms CREZ (SEPV2, SEPV8, SEPV9, 29 Palms PV, Wonder Valley PV, and Cascade Solar – some of which are described above) and one in the Iron Mountain CREZ.

BLM’s Solar Energy Development ProgramBLM prepared a Draft Solar PEIS that evaluates utility-scale solar energy development in six southwestern states, Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah.  A subset of the lands that would be available for ROW application under the Solar Energy Development Program Alternative would be identified as SEZs (i.e., areas with few impediments to utility-scale production of solar energy where the BLM would prioritize solar energy and associated transmission infrastructure development). The Riverside East Solar Energy Zone (SEZ) is still under consideration (October 2011 Supplement to the Draft Solar PEIS) along the I-10 near Desert Center, between Blythe and Indio, though 43,439 acres were eliminated from the NW portion of the SEZ and 11,547 acres identified as non-development areas to minimize environmental impacts.  The Iron Mountain SEZ, proposed near Rice, California, was eliminated from further consideration.  The public comment period for the Supplement to the Draft Solar Programmatic EIS (Draft Solar PEIS) began on October 28, 2011 and will close on January 27, 2012. Responses to comments received on the Supplement to the Draft Solar PEIS, as well as to comments received on the Draft Solar PEIS, will be included in the Final PEIS. Five public meetingswere held during this period. Transcripts and materials from the meetings will be made available through the Solar PEIS website soon after the meetings are completed.

Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (RECP): The DRECP will facilitate and streamline the approval and permitting of renewable energy projects in the Desert Region and serve as the basis for one or more Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) under the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA). Projects will include large-scale solar thermal, solar PV, wind, and associated infrastructure / transmission. Covered species include Mojave monkeyflower, Arroyo toad, desert tortoise, burrowing owl, Swainson’s hawk, Mojave ground squirrel, and bighorn sheep. Agencies intend to complete the DRECP by June 1, 2012.

California Desert Protection Act of 2011 (CDPA) (S.138):  Introduced by Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) in January 2011, the CDPA would preserve approximately 1.6 million acres of public lands, create two new National Monuments, expand Joshua Tree and Death Valley National Parks and the Mojave National Preserve, and establish new wilderness areas and wild and scenic river segments throughout Southern California. The bill would also preserve historic trails, Native American cultural areas, and portions of Old US 66.  The CDPA of 2011 would create the e 941,000-acre Mojave Trails National Monument and the Sand to Snow National Monument, which includes the Big Morongo Canyon Preserve, a local area with outstanding biodiversity and recreational opportunities. Big Morongo Canyon Preserve has been designated as a National Watchable Wildlife Site and is a world-class bird-watching destination due to the impressive diversity (almost 250 species) of both migratory and resident birds. The Canyon’s year-round stream flow is a critical water source for many of the desert bighorn sheep whose home range includes Big Morongo Canyon Preserve and Joshua Tree National Park.

On January 31, 2012, there will be a Community Meeting to update residents about the CDPA and the Sand to Snow National Monument.  The meeting will be held at Morongo Valley Elementary School, 10951 Hess Blvd, from 6:30 to 8:30 pm.  For more information, visit Morongo Valley News.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Whew!   wish I could say that that was all that is going on in the desert, but of course I’ve left out the two projects that most interest the community of Joshua Tree. Tune in next time for the lo-down on the lo-dez tribe behind the Casino proposal, and check back tomorrow for some late-breaking updates on Dollar General and their ongoing plot to take over the world, one piece of crap Chinese export at a time…..